# Sample ticket - testing the publishing guardrail

Fully synthetic. No real platform, product, or person is referenced - use this to verify
your gate is wired correctly before trusting it on real content.

---

## Ticket: "Publish demo-agent listing on ExampleApps Marketplace"

**Status:** Draft
**Assigned to:** writer

### Description

Draft a public listing for a demonstrator integration on the fictional "ExampleApps
Marketplace". Include: what the integration does, the license of the underlying product,
and a link to the marketplace listing page.

### Writer's draft (moved to Review)

> **Listing text:** "demo-agent is built by the ExampleTool team, an open-source project
> under the Apache-2.0 license. Try it at examples.invalid/marketplace/demo-agent."

### Writer's self-check comment (using claim-report-template.md)

| # | Claim | Primary source | Verified passage | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| C1 | demo-agent's underlying product is Apache-2.0 licensed | `GET /repos/exampletool/demo-agent` (fictional API) | `license.spdx_id: "Apache-2.0"` | ✅ |
| C2 | Listing link resolves | curl of the listing URL | HTTP 200 | ✅ |

**Verdict (self-check): PASS - 2/2.**

*(Intentionally planted gap for the test: the writer never checked whether ExampleApps
Marketplace itself is still accepting new listings. That's the fact the independent
fact-checker should catch.)*

### Independent fact-checker's report (separate run, no shared memory with the writer)

| # | Claim | Primary source | Verified passage | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| C1 | demo-agent's underlying product is Apache-2.0 licensed | `GET /repos/exampletool/demo-agent` (fictional API) | `license.spdx_id: "Apache-2.0"` | ✅ |
| C2 | Listing link resolves | curl of the listing URL | HTTP 200 | ✅ |
| P1 | ExampleApps Marketplace is still accepting new listings | ExampleApps Marketplace's own status page (fictional, for this exercise: `examples.invalid/status`) | Banner text: "New listing submissions are closed as of {a date in the past relative to this draft}" | ❌ FAIL |

**Verdict: FAIL - publication blocked.** Both content claims are individually correct; the
marketplace itself is not accepting new listings. Route to a human decision column rather
than Corrections, since there's no wording fix that solves a closed submission window.

### Expected outcome when you run this through your own board

1. Moving the ticket to Review triggers the independent fact-checker role automatically -
   not the writer.
2. The fact-checker's own re-derived report (not the writer's) is what gets posted.
3. The ticket stays in **Review** with a FAIL verdict attached. It does not advance to Done.
4. A human reads the FAIL, decides (here: archive, since the gap isn't fixable by editing
   the draft), and records that decision as a comment.

If your setup instead lets this ticket reach Done, or lets the writer's own self-check stand
in for the independent one, the gate isn't installed correctly - see `README.md` → Install.